PP1 (Shorter) Verbal Section 2 (Hard) Q7

<p><span style="color:#27ae60;"><span style="font-size:20px;">The Right Answer</span></span></p> <p>This is an <span style="color:#8e44ad;">Organization</span>, or <span style="color:#8e44ad;">Structure</span>, question. What that means is this question is asking us to identify the order of the elements of the passage. What does the author do first? Second? Third? Fourth?&nbsp;</p> <p>By identifying the function of each sentence in the passage, we can easily choose the correct answer:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Sentence 1</strong>: common belief regarding Johnson&#39;s greatness</li> <li><strong>Sentence 2</strong>: (main idea) additional, perhaps overlooked, quality of Johnson&#39;s greatness</li> <li><strong>Sentence 3</strong>: observation about the novelty of blending musical genres</li> <li><strong>Sentence 4</strong>: author&#39;s statement that Johnson &quot;expanded&quot; this blending</li> <li><strong>Sentence 5</strong>: support for main idea</li> <li><strong>Sentence 6</strong>: more support for main idea</li> </ul> <p>With the function of each sentence identified, it becomes clear that <span style="color:#27ae60;">C is the correct answer: a common viewpoint is presented and modified, and the modification is supported</span>.</p> <p>Sentence 1 is of course the &quot;common viewpoint,&quot; Sentence 2 is its &quot;modification,&quot; and the second paragraph provides the support.</p> <p><span style="font-size:20px;"><span style="color:#e74c3c;">The Wrong Answers</span></span></p> <ul> <li><span style="color:#e74c3c;">A</span>: The first paragraph does not really provide a &quot;historical overview.&quot; In addition, there is no clearly identified &quot;phenomenon&quot; in the second paragraph.</li> <li><span style="color:#e74c3c;">B</span>: The author never &quot;challenges&quot; the popular belief.</li> <li><span style="color:#e74c3c;">D</span>: The author never &quot;rejects&quot; an observation.</li> <li><span style="color:#e74c3c;">E</span>: The author never &quot;investigates&quot; the common claim. In addition, the author never &quot;criticizes&quot; an alternative outlook.&nbsp;</li> </ul> <p>&nbsp;</p>